| 
				
				
				The UN originally came down in 
				favour of establishing a third ad hoc International 
				Criminal Tribunal. Faced with stiff opposition from the 
				Cambodian Government, the UN compromised successively concerning 
				the legal status of the court and its structure. A consensus 
				finally seemed to have been reached in July 2000, when a UN 
				negotiating team left Phnom Penh with a draft Memorandum of 
				Understanding concerning ‘significant international 
				co-operation’ in trials before ‘Extraordinary Chambers’ of the 
				Cambodian courts (the ‘draft MOU’). 
				
				
				In the event, the law finally 
				promulgated by Cambodia on 10 August 2001 in order to set up 
				these Chambers (the ‘2001 
				Law’) was not entirely consistent with the terms of the 
				draft MOU. In the absence of progress concerning these 
				differences, the Secretary-General pulled the UN out of the 
				negotiations in February 2002. However, the UN General Assembly 
				requested him to continue negotiating on the basis of the 2001 
				Law and, on 17 March 2003, an amended bi-lateral agreement was 
				negotiated which went some way towards addressing the concerns 
				of the Secretary-General (the ‘2003 
				Agreement’). 
				
				The Agreement was officially signed in Phnom Penh 
				on 6 June 2003. 
				
				
				Yet, it was only ratified by 
				Cambodia on 19 October 2004, after the formation of a new 
				government. The 2001 Law was then
				
				amended, on 27 October 2004, to bring it into conformity 
				with the international Agreement. 
				
				
				The UN indicated that the 
				Agreement would not come into force until the budget for the 
				Chambers had been secured, which occurred on 29 April 2005, 
				after a donors conference received promises covering the 
				quasi-totality of the US$43M voluntary international 
				contributions. At the end of 2005, Cambodia had not yet found 
				the totality of its share of the budget (US$13.3M).   |